Difference between revisions of "Wiki forum"

From OpenFOAMWiki
m (Logo)
(Mediawiki)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
: Switched it on for the Main-namespace (havn't tested it though). Is it necessary for any other namespaces? [[User:Bgschaid|Bgschaid]] 10:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 
: Switched it on for the Main-namespace (havn't tested it though). Is it necessary for any other namespaces? [[User:Bgschaid|Bgschaid]] 10:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
:: Thanks Bernhard! [[User:Hoogs|Hoogs]] 05:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Could we add the [http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:Cite/Cite.php Cite] extension? [[User:Hoogs|Hoogs]] 05:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
  
 
=Logo=
 
=Logo=

Revision as of 06:02, 18 September 2009

This page provides a place to discuss ideas and issues related to this wiki. Precede lines with one or more ":" characters to simulate threads and end with four tilde characters ~~~~ to put a name and date stamp, e.g.

Here's my very important statement Pompous 03:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

I second that Sycophant 10:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
No no, you're all wrong! Contrarian 18:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

1 Mediawiki

Bernhard has done a great job of keeping the wiki back end up to date, thanks Benhard!!! Hoogs 03:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Could we turn on subpage functionality? Its a simple switch. Its already on by default in User pages, e.g. User:Hoogs. As long as users keep hierarchy to only a few levels (1-3), it shouldn't do any harm, and can help give a little more logical structure to the info that we have. Hoogs 03:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

Switched it on for the Main-namespace (havn't tested it though). Is it necessary for any other namespaces? Bgschaid 10:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Thanks Bernhard! Hoogs 05:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Could we add the Cite extension? Hoogs 05:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

I felt for a long time that this site could use a new logo. Does anyone else agree? Hoogs 03:11, 3 September 2009 (UTC)

I'm not completely opposed to the idea (although I already feel some nostalgia for the current logo;) ). Nevertheless I think that the logo should clearly be recognisable as OpenFOAMish while not violating (and being confused with) any existing copyrighted Logos. Feel free to post any suggestions (I know you already have one) here and we'll discuss it Bgschaid 11:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC)