View source for Talk:Project Guidelines

• [View source↑]
• [History↑]

Sorting order: last modified first newest threads first oldest threads first

Contents

Thread title	Replies	Last modified
Discussions on unresolved topics	1	10:53, 29 March 2014
Github/Bitpucket pull-request	1	10:44, 29 March 2014

Discussions on unresolved topics

• History
• Summarize

Collapse

I think it would be best to first discuss new topics here before adding them to the main page (especially if you don't agree with something people say there or if you're offering alternatives - like the Github or Bitbucket-entry). That way it can be avoided that large chunks of text will be afterwards "edited away". Which for some people will look like censorship

• More
  • History
  • View source
  • Link to
  • Drag to new location

Bgschaid (talk)‎01:34, 28 March 2014

Collapse

I personally don't mind that my proposal get's scratched away from the main page at all - the page then can serve as a proposal summary (not get burried in a discussion) and then removed later if people are against it. but I definitely agree with you on this, others may feel differently about this.

• Parent
• More
  • History
  • View source
  • Link to
  • Drag to new location

Tomislav Maric (talk)‎10:53, 29 March 2014

 

Github/Bitpucket pull-request

• History
• Summarize

Collapse

I believe recently Sourceforg added a "Fork"-button to git and mercurial-repositories. Haven't tried it yet, but I think this would allow something similar inside the existing infrastructure

• More
  • History
  • View source
  • Link to
  • Drag to new location

Bgschaid (talk)‎01:30, 28 March 2014

Collapse

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

• The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
• You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page:

What I really like about the pull request system of github is that zero work is included in organizing teams in transparent way (same goes for bitbucket), and the code review process is fully open and easily done by a lot of people at once - this is what both sites specialize in. I don't want to be the stupid new guy that pushes new things (although I am playing that role very well for now :)), but I really do believe that using those services would make it easier for newcomers to get involved. I've used bitbucket for collaborative work and the part of the web interface that deals with collaboration is way more clear and way more powerful than the one on sourceforge. And since the project is based on git, moving it to github / bitbucket should take like 10 minutes, right?

Return to Thread:Talk:Project Guidelines/Github/Bitpucket pull-request/reply.

 

• 2 clicks for increased privacy: only when you click here the button will be activated and you can send your recommendation to Facebook. The activation will transmit data to third parties – see i.not connected to Facebook
  
• 2 clicks for increased privacy: only when you click here the button will be activated and you can send your recommendation to Twitter. The activation will transmit data to third parties – see i.nicht mit Twitter verbunden
  
• 2 clicks for increased privacy: only when you click here the button will be activated and you can send your recommendation to Google+. The activation will transmit data to third parties – see i.nicht mit Google+ verbunden
  
• If you activate one of these fields data will be sent to and stored by Facebook, Twitter or Google. For further information click on the i (use the translation service of your choice).Einstellungen

  Agree to permanently activate the data transmission to:

  FacebookTwitterGoogle+