ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D

From OpenFOAMWiki
Revision as of 20:22, 21 June 2010 by Shashax (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Back to the previous page


1 Running the case

This case is computed using the GGI interface between the impeller and the diffuser.

Follow these steps to run the case from scratch:

First make sure that you have the following installed:

  • A recent revision of OpenFOAM-1.5-dev
  • libOpenFOAMTurbo.so (needed for the inlet boundary condition)
  • the solver transientSimpleDyMFoam compiled
  • The boundary condition turboWallFixedValue compiled
  • libsimpleFunctionObjects.so (or comment out the trackDictionaryContent function from ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D/system/controlDict)
  • libsampling.so (or comment out the ggiCheck function from ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D/system/controlDict)
cd $FOAM_RUN/ercoftacCentrifugalPump/cases/transientSimpleDyMFoam/ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D

The method of parallel computing should be used in this case, the first step is to decompose the domain using the decomposePar utility as following:

decomposePar >& log_decomposePar&

After the decomposePar finished, the parallel running in this case comes as following:

mpirun -np 32 transientSimpleDyMFoam -parallel >& log_transientSimpleDyMFoam&

After this case has been run in parallel, it can be reconstructed performed by the reconstructPar utility as the following command:

reconstructPar >& log_reconstructPar&

2 Post-processing the case

The post-processing is automatized, and can be executed by doing:

cd $FOAM_RUN/ercoftacCentrifugalPump/cases/transientSimpleDyMFoam/ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D/postProcessing
./Allrun >& log_Allrun&

Likewise, if needed, the post-processing can be cleaned up by doing

 cd $FOAM_RUN/ercoftacCentrifugalPump/cases/transientSimpleDyMFoam/ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D/postProcessing
./Allclean

This deletes all the data that have been calculated from the post-processing, so be sure that you do not want to save anything from the previous calculation before cleaning up the post-processing.

3 Results

3.1 General results

Movie showing unsteady results: Media:U_3D_3.gif and Media:p_3D_2.gif

U color 3Dunsteady.jpg

Figure 2: Velocity magnitude of the transientSimpleDyMFoam/ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D test case at the midspan position

P color 3Dunsteady.jpg

Figure 3: Static pressure of the transientSimpleDyMFoam/ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D test case at the midspan position

3.2 Comparison with the experimental data

Wr 126 color ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D.png

Figure 5: Comparison with the experimental data for the relative radial velocity at the midspan position (Experimental results taken from Ubaldi 1998 [2])

Wu 126 color ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D.png

Figure 6: Comparison with the experimental data for the relative tangential velocity at the midspan position (Experimental results taken from Ubaldi 1998 [2])

Wr map 126 color ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D.png

Figure 7: Comparison with the experimental data for the relative radial velocity for different span distances (Experimental results taken from Ubaldi 1998 [2])

Wu map 126 color ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D.png

Figure 8: Comparison with the experimental data for the relative tangential velocity for different span distances (Experimental results taken from Ubaldi 1998 [2])

Cp color ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D.png

Figure 9: Comparison with the experimental data for the static pressure coefficient at the midspan position (Experimental results taken from Ubaldi 1998 [2])

Cp map color ECPMixerGgiFvMesh3D.png

Figure 10: Comparison with the experimental data for the static pressure coefficient for different radius (Experimental results taken from Ubaldi 1998 [2])


Back to the previous page

Back to the top

Back to Sig Turbomachinery