Best way to link this page

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

• The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
• You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.
• Your username or IP address has been blocked. The block was made by DNSBL. The reason given is Your IP address is listed as an open proxy in the DNSBL used by OpenFOAMWiki..
  • Start of block: 02:44, 1 May 2024
  • Expiry of block: 02:44, 1 May 2024
  • Intended blockee: 18.191.186.72
  You can contact DNSBL or another administrator to discuss the block. You cannot use the "email this user" feature unless a valid email address is specified in your account preferences and you have not been blocked from using it. Your current IP address is 18.191.186.72, and the block ID is #. Please include all above details in any queries you make.

---

You can view and copy the source of this page:

Yeah. That page never really got off. I think a better place would be [[OpenFOAM_guide|this page]]. Maybe with a new category (doesn't seem to fit one of the existing ones) Reminds me: I should link that one from the front page

Return to Thread:Talk:Src UML/Best way to link this page/reply.

I have moved the page to "OpenFOAM guide" in the new category "OpenFOAM source code documentation". This new category should be sufficiently broad to cover a wide range of (future) pages, but still specific enough as to only attract readers which are actually looking for this information.

Currently, the subpage "lagrangian" is a subpage of a parent page UML, and not linked via a category (as I understand is the convention?). I purposely made this a subpage ("OpenFOAM guide/UML/lagrangian"), since a future page "OpenFOAM guide/lagrangian" is not hard to imagine, whilst it will serve a different purpose. Linking it via a subpage (for the unicity in name) AND a category seems verbose to me.

Also, subpaging + categorizing (as is currently done for all "OpenFOAM guide/..." pages), has the problem that everything is categorized underneath the "O", which takes away a large part of the purpose of categorization.

Opinions?

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Floquation (talk)‎15:32, 1 December 2014

Moving: Excellent

The convention is open to discussion

I think that having sub-pages as well as categories allows a page in the categories-section to assume two roles (show up in UML and "Physical models" if there was such a category for instance). Also (but I must check this) it is possible to have sub-categories to categories. But I'd only recommend that kind of sub-compartmentalization for categories with two-digit numbers of pages

• Parent
• More

• History
• View source
• Link to

Bgschaid (talk)‎16:52, 1 December 2014