Difference between revisions of "Two Dimensional Rising Bubble Benchmark (two cases)"
From OpenFOAMWiki
(→The benchmark of Hysing et. al) |
(→The benchmark of Hysing et. al) |
||
| (9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===The benchmark of Hysing et. al=== | ===The benchmark of Hysing et. al=== | ||
| − | + | Hysing et. al <ref>Hysing, S.; Turek, S.; Kuzmin, D.; Parolini, N.; Burman, E.; Ganesan, S.; Tobiska, L.: Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Volume 60 Issue 11, Pages 1259-1288, DOI: 10.1002/fld.1934, 2009, [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.1934/abstract] | |
| + | </ref> published 2009 a pure numerical benchmark with two test cases for a 2D rising bubble. The reference data can be downloaded here [http://www.featflow.de/en/benchmarks/cfdbenchmarking/bubble.html]. | ||
| + | The boundary conditions are visualized in the following picture: [[Image:KlostermannEtAl_TestCases.png|c|center|Initial and boundary conditions]] | ||
| − | + | The two test case are distinguished by the material properties resulting in two different non-dimensional groups see table with material properties: | |
| − | + | {| class="wikitable" align="center" | |
| − | + | |+ The material properties of the two test cases | |
| + | |- | ||
| + | ! Case | ||
| + | ! ρ1 | ||
| + | ! ρ2 | ||
| + | ! μ1 | ||
| + | ! μ2 | ||
| + | ! g | ||
| + | ! σ | ||
| + | ! Re | ||
| + | ! Eo | ||
| + | ! Ca | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | TC1 | ||
| + | | 1000 | ||
| + | | 100 | ||
| + | | 10 | ||
| + | | 1 | ||
| + | | 0.98 | ||
| + | | 24.5 | ||
| + | | 35 | ||
| + | | 10 | ||
| + | | 0.286 | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | TC2 | ||
| + | | 1000 | ||
| + | | 1 | ||
| + | | 10 | ||
| + | | 0.1 | ||
| + | | 0.98 | ||
| + | | 1.96 | ||
| + | | 35 | ||
| + | | 125 | ||
| + | | 3.571 | ||
| + | |} | ||
| − | |||
| − | + | The test cases and solver as used in <ref>Klostermann, J.; Schaake, K.; Schwarze, R.: Numerical simulation of a single rising bubble by VOF with surface compression, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Article first published online: 16 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1002/fld.3692 [http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.3692/abstract] | |
| + | </ref>:[[Media:TestCasesAndSolver.zip]] eventually rename the variable gamma to alpha1 (both in the test cases and the solver) depending on the version of OF you are using. | ||
| − | + | Jens 12:20, 23 July 2012 (CEST) | |
| + | |||
| + | ==References== | ||
| − | + | <references /> | |
Latest revision as of 10:20, 23 July 2012
1 The benchmark of Hysing et. al
Hysing et. al [1] published 2009 a pure numerical benchmark with two test cases for a 2D rising bubble. The reference data can be downloaded here [3].
The boundary conditions are visualized in the following picture:
The two test case are distinguished by the material properties resulting in two different non-dimensional groups see table with material properties:
| Case | ρ1 | ρ2 | μ1 | μ2 | g | σ | Re | Eo | Ca |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC1 | 1000 | 100 | 10 | 1 | 0.98 | 24.5 | 35 | 10 | 0.286 |
| TC2 | 1000 | 1 | 10 | 0.1 | 0.98 | 1.96 | 35 | 125 | 3.571 |
The test cases and solver as used in [2]:Media:TestCasesAndSolver.zip eventually rename the variable gamma to alpha1 (both in the test cases and the solver) depending on the version of OF you are using.
Jens 12:20, 23 July 2012 (CEST)
2 References
- ↑ Hysing, S.; Turek, S.; Kuzmin, D.; Parolini, N.; Burman, E.; Ganesan, S.; Tobiska, L.: Quantitative benchmark computations of two-dimensional bubble dynamics, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Volume 60 Issue 11, Pages 1259-1288, DOI: 10.1002/fld.1934, 2009, [1]
- ↑ Klostermann, J.; Schaake, K.; Schwarze, R.: Numerical simulation of a single rising bubble by VOF with surface compression, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, Article first published online: 16 JUL 2012, DOI: 10.1002/fld.3692 [2]
