Version of XCode

Hi Bernhard,

sorry for my late reply, I didn't see your question until Bruno informed me about it.

I've successfully compiled it on Mountain Lion with both Xcode versions: v5.0.0 and v5.0.1 (current release) However, I didn't try to compile the nextRelease yet. And I also didn't compile it on Mavericks, although I intend to do so, soon. After I saw that some macports couldn't be compiled straight away, I downgraded from Mavericks back to Mountain Lion. Means I have no conclusive report on Mavericks yet.

Thanks for your many many contributions to the OpenFOAM community :) I'll let you know in case I manage to compile the nextRelease on Mountain Lion or Mavericks, or the current release on Mavericks.

Cheers, Bernhard

• Parent
• More
  • History
  • View source
  • Link to
  • Drag to new location

BernhardGrieser (talk)‎14:08, 2 November 2013

Which compiler did you use? MacPorts or the one from XCode? Because the latter caused some problems (not for me. I use the MacPorts-compilers)

• Parent
• More
  • History
  • View source
  • Link to
  • Drag to new location

Bgschaid (talk)‎22:32, 12 November 2013

I used the MacPorts compiler: g++ (MacPorts gcc46 4.6.4_3) 4.6.4

Why does the installation of MacPorts require the xcode command line tools? Do you have an idea why I was not able to install rpm via MacPorts on Mavericks? (Since I downgraded back to Mountain Lion, I cannot reproduce error messages right now... you might still have a clue, though :)

• Parent
• More
  • History
  • View source
  • Link to
  • Drag to new location

BernhardGrieser (talk)‎20:00, 13 November 2013

I guess MacPorts requires the command line tools because although they deliver binary packages nowadays technically it is a "source only"-distro and even if it would use its own compiler it would need some compiler to bootstrap the compilation of that. Which happens to be the XCode-compiler. Plus there may be other utilities that are MacOS-X specific and for which no OpenSource-alternative exists (the linker?)

About rpm: without the error message it is hard

• Parent
• More
  • History
  • View source
  • Link to
  • Drag to new location

Bgschaid (talk)‎13:24, 16 November 2013

 

 

 

• 2 clicks for increased privacy: only when you click here the button will be activated and you can send your recommendation to Facebook. The activation will transmit data to third parties – see i.not connected to Facebook
  
• 2 clicks for increased privacy: only when you click here the button will be activated and you can send your recommendation to Twitter. The activation will transmit data to third parties – see i.nicht mit Twitter verbunden
  
• 2 clicks for increased privacy: only when you click here the button will be activated and you can send your recommendation to Google+. The activation will transmit data to third parties – see i.nicht mit Google+ verbunden
  
• If you activate one of these fields data will be sent to and stored by Facebook, Twitter or Google. For further information click on the i (use the translation service of your choice).Einstellungen

  Agree to permanently activate the data transmission to:

  FacebookTwitterGoogle+