Sig Numerical Optimization / Optimization methods comparison

From OpenFOAMWiki
< Sig Numerical Optimization
Revision as of 09:17, 21 August 2014 by Crixman (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Optimization Methods comparison

The following table aims to provide an overview of the main optimization methods included in Dakota, OpenFOAM and other optimization software.

Capabilities Description & usage Methods Tutorials & examples
Parameter study Simplest method to explore parameter space. Useful for simple studies with defined, repetative structure. vector / list / centered / multidimensional ...
Design of Experiments (DOE) / Design and Analysis of Computer Experiments (DACE) Sophisticated methods to explore parameter space. Recommended when global space-filling set of samples (multiple variables) is needed. DOE is largely used for physical experiments and tends to place samples to space's extremes, while DACE is more space-fulflling Central Composite Design / Box-Behnken sampling / Monte Carlo (random) sampling / Latin hypercube sampling / Orthogonal array / Orthogonal array – Latin Hypercube Sampling / Grid Design / Psuade Moat Blunt Body case
Optimization
Non-linear Least Squares
Surrogate-Based Minimization
Adjoint Shape Optimization